EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The role of belief in the case for austerity policies

Sheila Dow

The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2015, vol. 26, issue 1, 29-42

Abstract: Mainstream economists give the misleading impression that their argument for austerity is purely technical and indeed the most ‘scientific’. The argument developed here is that their reasoning is not, any more than that of their heterodox critics, independent of ideology, power and ethics. The widespread belief in austerity policies as scientifically justified has prevented arguments against austerity gaining more traction; issues of ideology, power and ethics need to be brought to the fore as part of the arguments on both sides. In other words, awareness of the epistemological issues arising from an open-system ontology is critical to understanding the crisis and the policy response, and therefore to challenging that understanding and encouraging a radical policy shift. The critique of austerity policies would therefore be strengthened by a critique of the mainstream’s rhetorical (mis)representation of economic theorising.

Keywords: Belief; fiscal austerity; science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 E1 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304614567262 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:29-42

DOI: 10.1177/1035304614567262

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2022-12-07
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:29-42