Economics at your fingertips  

Between universalism and targeting: Exploring policy pathways for an Australian Basic Income

Ben Spies-Butcher, Ben Phillips and Troy Henderson
Additional contact information
Ben Spies-Butcher: Macquarie University, Australia
Ben Phillips: The Australian National University, Australia
Troy Henderson: The University of Sydney, Australia

The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2020, vol. 31, issue 4, 502-523

Abstract: Despite growing interest in proposals for a universal basic income, little advance has been made in implementation. Here we explore policy options for an Australian Basic Income. Our analysis responds to concerns that Basic Income is both too expensive and too radical a departure from existing welfare state structures to be a feasible policy option. Drawing on policy and Basic Income scholarship we identify changes to Australia’s current means-tested benefits structures that move substantially towards Basic Income while remaining consistent with historic policy norms, which we call ‘affluence testing’. Using microsimulation we explore fiscal and distributional trade-offs associated with the implementation of an affluence-tested Basic Income. Our results suggest Basic Income has the potential to significantly reduce inequality and poverty while also requiring taxes to rise substantially. Placing these trade-offs in international context we find the policy would reduce inequality to levels similar to Nordic welfare states while increasing overall taxation to approximately the OECD average. JEL Codes: I3, H2, H5

Keywords: Basic income; fiscal policy; income distribution; social policy; taxation/taxation system/taxation policy; welfare state (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.1177/1035304620964272

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

Page updated 2021-01-02
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:31:y:2020:i:4:p:502-523