Labour and megaprojects: Rethinking productivity and industrial relations policy

Bradon Ellem
Additional contact information
Bradon Ellem: The University of Sydney Business School, Australia

The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2021, vol. 32, issue 3, 399-416

Abstract: The coronavirus pandemic has brought industrial relations policy to the centre of attention in many countries. In 2020, the Australian government convened tripartite bodies to address policy in several areas, one being for agreement-making to cover labour on ‘megaprojects’. This initiative revisited criticisms of unions for driving costs up and productivity down on these worksites, the most expensive of which had been Chevron’s Gorgon site, a liquefied natural gas project off the north-west Australian coast. Drawing on four usually siloed literatures – on industrial relations policy, megaprojects, the economic geography of resources and labour process – this article explains concerns about costs, delays and productivity in terms of project work itself. This approach leads to a different understanding of the merits of changing policy to address megaproject’s problems and productivity more broadly. JEL Codes: J52, J58, L71

Keywords: Agreement-making; economic geography; industrial relations policy; labour; labour process; liquefied natural gas; megaprojects; productivity; unions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304620984294 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:399-416

DOI: 10.1177/1035304620984294

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().