Opposition through the back door in the transposition of EU directives

Robert Thomson
Additional contact information
Robert Thomson: Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, thomsor@tcd.ie

European Union Politics, 2010, vol. 11, issue 4, 577-596

Abstract: Are member states less likely to transpose a European Union directive correctly if they disagreed with the directive at the decision-making stage? Existing research provides mixed answers to this question. Most of this research does not consider the role of the enforcement agent, the European Commission, and uses aggregate measures. By contrast, this study considers the impact of the Commission, and focuses on specific provisions in directives. It combines detailed information on states’ disagreement with each provision at the decision-making stage and the quality of national transposition of each provision. The descriptive analysis shows that protracted non-compliance in national transposition is a rare event. The explanatory analysis indicates that states’ policy preferences significantly affect the likelihood of transposition problems, and that this is conditioned by the behaviour of the Commission.

Keywords: compliance; European Union directives; implementation; incentives to deviate; transposition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116510380283 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:11:y:2010:i:4:p:577-596

DOI: 10.1177/1465116510380283

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().