Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European Semester

Mattia Guidi and Igor Guardiancich

European Union Politics, 2018, vol. 19, issue 4, 684-706

Abstract: The European Semester, launched in 2011, enhances the coordination of macroeconomic policies among European Union member states. This article contributes to the lively scholarly debate on whether this policy-making cycle has empowered more the European supranational or intergovernmental institutions. Drawing on a new dataset covering all pension-related country-specific recommendations between 2011 and 2016, and employing an original quantitative method, we show that the Commission mainly follows a ‘technocratic’ approach in drafting its recommendations, which are grounded in objective indicators. As the Council refrains from systematically altering the recommendations’ logic, we conclude that, at least in pension policy, the Commission’s role in macroeconomic surveillance has been significantly strengthened in the aftermath of the Great Recession.

Keywords: Country-specific recommendations; economic and monetary union; European Semester; pensions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116518781029 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:19:y:2018:i:4:p:684-706

DOI: 10.1177/1465116518781029

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().