Get your Act Together

Federico Ferrara and J. Timo Weishaupt
Additional contact information
Federico Ferrara: Harvard University, USA, ferrara@fas.harvard.edu
J. Timo Weishaupt: University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, weishaupt@polisci.wisc.edu

European Union Politics, 2004, vol. 5, issue 3, 283-306

Abstract: Research on elections to the European Parliament (EP) has consistently found that European elections are distinguished by a lack of European content. Such elections, in spite of the growing powers exercised by the EP, remain ‘second-order’. Clearly, however, EU-related issues have affected the performance of some political parties in EP elections, particularly in countries such as Sweden and Denmark. In our empirical analysis of the three most recent EP elections, we explain party choice as a function of both European and non-EU-related factors. Through the use of standard regression models, we find that the parties that have not ‘got their act together’ on European issues—whose internal fractionalization leads to ambiguities about their stance on EU integration—systematically perform worse. We also corroborate some of the implications of the ‘second-order’ model and resolve some empirical disputes.

Keywords: elections; European integration; European Parliament; party choice; second-order model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116504045154 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:5:y:2004:i:3:p:283-306

DOI: 10.1177/1465116504045154

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().