The Structure of Conflict over EU Chemicals Policy

Karl-Oskar Lindgren and Thomas Persson
Additional contact information
Karl-Oskar Lindgren: Uppsala University, Sweden, Karl-Oskar.Lindgren@statsvet.uu.se

European Union Politics, 2008, vol. 9, issue 1, 31-58

Abstract: There is a lively academic debate over whether political cleavages in the European Union (EU) follow mainly territorial (national) or non-territorial (ideological) patterns. This article analyses the cleavages that structure the conflict over European chemicals policy, the so-called REACH system. Taking positions on this major policy as an empirical example, we test these competing theories on the nature of cleavages on environmental policy issues in the EU. We use data from an expert survey of more than 600 individuals to fulfil this aim. The results show that neither of the hypotheses is unequivocally supported. But the data indicate that cleavages based on non-territorial interests are much more important than territorial interests in explaining positions on REACH.

Keywords: chemicals policy; cleavage structure; political contestation; territorial/non-territorial interests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116507085956 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:9:y:2008:i:1:p:31-58

DOI: 10.1177/1465116507085956

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().