Does State Ownership of Banks Matter?

Denis Davydov

Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 2018, vol. 17, issue 2, 250-285

Abstract: This article examines the effects of state ownership and government interventions on lending behaviour and capitalisation of banks over the period 2005–2011. Using data from the highly state-influenced Russian banking sector, it is documented that the relationship between state ownership and lending is nonlinear. While overall loan growth decreased and interest rates rose, it was found that fully state-controlled banks increased lending and charged lower interest rates during the crisis of 2008–2010. Moreover, fully state-owned and state-supported banks demonstrated counter-cyclical lending behaviour during the crisis. However, while state-owned banks were better protected against asset default, there is weak evidence to suggest that government interventions may result in increased riskiness of banks.

Keywords: Bank lending; state ownership; privatisation; financial crisis; government interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972652718776862 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:emffin:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:250-285

DOI: 10.1177/0972652718776862

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Emerging Market Finance from Institute for Financial Management and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().