On Economic Policy Responses to Disruptions: A Reply to Harry Saunders

Bert G. Hickman, Hillard Huntington and James L. Sweeney

The Energy Journal, 1989, vol. 10, issue 4, 189-198

Abstract: At its heart, Harry Saunders' Comment raises two principal criticisms I of the EMF study, "Macroeconomic Impacts of Energy Shocks"; The EMF study held constant the disrupted-state world oil price; effects of policy actions on the world oil price were not included. Saunders faults the EMF for not explicitly examining these effects. But further, he implies that, in estimating effects of policy actions to counter the oil shock, modelers should have held constant the disrupted-state quantity of oil consumed in the US.

Keywords: Energy shocks; Macroeconomic impacts; Oil policy responses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol10-No4-14 (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: On Economic Policy Responses to Disruptions: A Reply to Harry Saunders (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:enejou:v:10:y:1989:i:4:p:189-198

DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol10-No4-14

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Energy Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().