DECOMMISSIONING AND NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY: COMPREHENSIVE OR SEPARABLE?*

Duane Chapman

The Energy Journal, 1991, vol. 12, issue 1_suppl, 247-254

Abstract: Waste handling is one of the tasks most likely to drive up decommissioning costs. This expense is derived from the large volumes of waste involved, from public apprehensions about its safe and prudent disposal, and from the uncertainties associated with long-term on-site storage of waste as is the current practice. Current U.S. nuclear policy addresses low-level waste (LLW) separately from high-level waste (HLW), military waste separately from civilian waste, and even has different packaging requirements for different types of LLW. These differences mean that there are different disposal sites, different transportation routes, and reduced economies of scale. In this chapter, Duane Chapman argues for a more comprehensive consideration of this waste.

Keywords: Nuclear deommissioning; Nuclear waste policy; Low-level waste; High-level waste (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol12-NoSI-19 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:enejou:v:12:y:1991:i:1_suppl:p:247-254

DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol12-NoSI-19

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Energy Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().