The Greenhouse Debate: Economic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies

Alan Manne and Richard Richels

The Energy Journal, 1995, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-37

Abstract: We address the issue of economic efficiency as it relates to climate change. We begin with a classical cost-benefit perspective. That is, we focus on emission trajectories which maximize net benefits. We then examine the consequences of adopting alternative decision making paradigms—for example, those based on limiting atmospheric concentrations so as to achieve an "ample margin of safety." We also consider the regional distribution of costs and benefits under alternative burden sharing schemes. Although the climate issue is often viewed from a global perspective, international negotiators will be acutely interested in how damages and mitigation costs might be distributed among individual regions. Finally, we address the issue of decision making under uncertainty. The challenge confronting today's policy makers is to identify a sensible hedging strategy—one that balances the risks of waiting against those of premature action.

Keywords: Greenhouse gases; climate change; burden sharing; MERGE model; economic efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol16-No4-1 (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Greenhouse Debate: Econonmic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:enejou:v:16:y:1995:i:4:p:1-37

DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol16-No4-1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Energy Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().