Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund

Richard Tol

The Energy Journal, 2006, vol. 27, issue 3_suppl, 235-250

Abstract: The costs of greenhouse gas emission reduction with abatement of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide are investigated using the FUND model. The central policy scenario keeps anthropogenic radiative forcing below 4.5 Wm2. If CO2 emission reduction were the only possibility to meet this target, the net present value of consumption losses would be $45 trillion; with abatement of the other gases added, costs fall to $33 trillion. The bulk of these costs savings can be ascribed to reductions of nitrous oxide. Because nitrous oxide emission reduction is so much more important than methane emission reduction, the choice of equivalence metric between the greenhouse gases does not matter much. Sensitivity analyses show that the shape of the cost curves for CH4 and N2O emission reductions matter, and that the inclusion of sulphate aerosols makes policy targets substantially harder to achieve. The costs of emission reduction vary greatly with the choice of stabilisation target. A target of 4.5 Wm-2 is not justified by our current knowledge of the damage costs of climate change.

Keywords: Multi-gas emission reduction; Climate change policy; FUND model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI3-11 (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund (2006)
Working Paper: MULTI-GAS EMISSION REDUCTION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY: AN APPLICATION OF FUND (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:enejou:v:27:y:2006:i:3_suppl:p:235-250

DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI3-11

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Energy Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().