Cursed Resources? Political Conditions and Oil Market Outcomes

Gilbert Metcalf and Catherine Wolfram

The Energy Journal, 2015, vol. 36, issue 3, 331-358

Abstract: We analyze how a country’s political institutions affect oil production within its borders. We find a pronounced negative relationship between political openness and volatility in oil production, with democratic regimes exhibiting less volatility than more autocratic regimes. This relationship holds across a number of robustness checks including using different measures of political conditions, instrumenting for political conditions and using several measures of production volatility. Political openness also affects other oil market outcomes, including total production as a share of reserves. Our findings have implications both for interpreting the role of institutions in explaining differences in macroeconomic development and for understanding world oil markets.

Keywords: Oil Supply; Oil Disruptions; Political Institutions; Energy Security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.36.3.gmet (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Cursed Resources? Political Conditions and Oil Market Outcomes (2016)
Journal Article: Cursed Resources? Political Conditions and Oil Market Outcomes (2015)
Working Paper: Cursed Resources? Political Conditions and Oil Market Outcomes (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:enejou:v:36:y:2015:i:3:p:331-358

DOI: 10.5547/01956574.36.3.gmet

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Energy Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().