Nuclear Waste Management at the Interface of Science and Policy: The Canadian Experience

William Leiss
Additional contact information
William Leiss: O. C., Ph.D., FRSC Scientist McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment. University of Ottawa 1 Stewart Street, Room 311 Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada

Energy & Environment, 2008, vol. 19, issue 3-4, 413-426

Abstract: This paper reviews briefly the history of Canada's civilian nuclear energy program and the consideration of the problem of long-term disposal of nuclear waste. It shows that, after a period of twenty years of initial official deliberations on this problem, the decision making process foundered in the face of a specific dilemma: how to include, within an integrated assessment framework, both “technical†(expert judgment) and “social†(public acceptability) considerations. It argues that an expanded risk management framework, illustrated below, now provides such a framework: The remainder of the paper reviews and comments on a decision making exercise, carried out in Canada in the year 2004, and using a method known as multi-attribute utility analysis (MAU), that provided a new approach to the issue of the management of nuclear waste. It argues that the MAU method has some distinctive advantages, over earlier approaches, where intrinsically controversial risk management situations are concerned.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/095830508784641354 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:engenv:v:19:y:2008:i:3-4:p:413-426

DOI: 10.1260/095830508784641354

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Energy & Environment
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().