Publication Bias in Measuring Anthropogenic Climate Change
Dominika Reckova and
Zuzana Irsova ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Dominika Špolcová
Energy & Environment, 2015, vol. 26, issue 5, 853-862
We present a meta-regression analysis of the relation between the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and changes in global temperature. The relation is captured by â€œclimate sensitivity,â€ which measures the response to a doubling of carbon dioxide concentrations compared to pre-industrial levels. Estimates of climate sensitivity play a crucial role in evaluating the impacts of climate change and constitute one of the most important inputs into the computation of the social cost of carbon, which reflects the socially optimal value of a carbon tax. Climate sensitivity has been estimated by many researchers, but their results vary significantly. We collect 48 estimates from 16 studies and analyze the literature quantitatively. We find evidence for publication selection bias: researchers tend to report preferentially large estimates of climate sensitivity. Corrected for publication bias, the bulk of the literature is consistent with climate sensitivity lying between 1.4 and 2.3Â°C.
Keywords: Climate sensitivity; climate change; CO2; publication bias; meta-analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Publication Bias in Measuring Anthropogenic Climate Change (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:engenv:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:853-862
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Energy & Environment
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().