Does an anticorruption campaign deteriorate environmental quality? Evidence from China

Boying Li, Yu Hao and Chun-Ping Chang

Energy & Environment, 2018, vol. 29, issue 1, 67-94

Abstract: This study makes a first attempt to thoroughly investigate the relationship between corruption and environmental quality in China from 1995 to 2011 using province-level panel data with both linear and nonlinear approaches. First, a linear least squares dummy variable corrected estimator is utilized. Second, the panel smooth transition regression is then employed to examine a potential nonlinear relationship between corruption and environmental quality. Our main empirical evidence indicates that the relationship between corruption and CO 2 emissions per capita varies by region in China. Although the anticorruption campaign significantly improves the environmental quality in western China, such an endeavor to some degree triggers pollutant emissions in eastern China and for all of China, whereas weak evidence is found in central region. These findings are also supported in our sensitivity analysis by using panel fixed effect model and a different air pollutant (i.e. SO 2 ). Thus, corruption is a double-edged sword and the Chinese central government should customize different anticorruption policies for different regions, as those western China could further launch its own anticorruption campaign, while eastern China and all of China should keep a balance between the anticorruption campaign and environmental protection regulation. Our evidence from China offers insights for other transitional economies considering how to formulate an anticorruption policy interacting with environmental issues.

Keywords: Corruption; CO2 emissions; panel smooth transition regression; environmental quality; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X17740717 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:engenv:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:67-94

DOI: 10.1177/0958305X17740717

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Energy & Environment
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().