Basic Human Needs versus Economic Growth Approach for Coping with Urban—Rural Imbalances: An Evaluation Based on Relative Welfare

K Mera
Additional contact information
K Mera: Institute of Socioeconomic Planning, University of Tsukuba, Sakura, Ibaraki 300-31, Japan

Environment and Planning A, 1979, vol. 11, issue 10, 1129-1145

Abstract: Increasing attention is being paid to the ‘basic human needs' approach for reducing imbalances within a developing country, urban—rural imbalances being important among them. However, as investment for meeting basic human needs is not directly productive, the future growth of the economy would have to be sacrificed if this approach is taken. In this paper the development implications of two approaches, the economic growth and the basic human needs approaches, are projected through a simulation model, and they are evaluated relative to each other. It is shown that, even if the evaluation is based on the criterion of the relative position of the rural population to the urban population, low-income countries would be better off with the economic growth approach after about ten years. For middle- and high-income countries, the basic human needs approach deserves serious consideration.

Date: 1979
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a111129 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:11:y:1979:i:10:p:1129-1145

DOI: 10.1068/a111129

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().