Urban Growth Models Revisited: Cities as Self-Organizing Systems

B Marchand
Additional contact information
B Marchand: Institut d'Urbanisme de l'Académie de Paris, Université de Paris VIII, 2 rue de la Liberté, 93 526 Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Environment and Planning A, 1984, vol. 16, issue 7, 949-964

Abstract: Spatial patterns seem to be very stable in Los Angeles, the most volatile of all US metropolises. Processes suggested by the classical growth models to explain these patterns have ceased to be applicable over the last fifty years or so, and have probably never played any important role in Los Angeles. A new conceptual model is proposed to integrate the rapidity of urban change and the persistence of spatial patterns. Urban forms and their content should be considered as independent of each other. Urban change appears as a dialectical process, whereas the spatial order of a city seems to be a geometrical and topological phenomenon with a logic of its own. Urban forms persist because a city is a self-organizing system. Such systems, analyzed by biologists such as Atlan, are able to absorb random perturbation while conserving their order. This model is applied to some examples in the USA, Europe, and Algeria.

Date: 1984
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a160949 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:16:y:1984:i:7:p:949-964

DOI: 10.1068/a160949

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().