Normative versus Heuristic Models of Residential Search Behavior: An Empirical Comparison

A G Phipps and R J Meyer
Additional contact information
A G Phipps: Department of Geography, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada
R J Meyer: Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA

Environment and Planning A, 1985, vol. 17, issue 6, 761-776

Abstract: In this paper is reported an empirical comparison between two models of residential search behavior: a normative stopping model derived by Phipps and Laverty and a heuristic model proposed by Meyer. This normative rule is exemplary of a large class of models in economics in which it is assumed that individuals act as if they maximize rational expectations when making sequential decisions. The heuristic rule, in contrast, is exemplary of descriptive models in psychology in which it is assumed that such decisions are better characterized by a more simplified cognitive algebra. A comparison is made of the ability of the models to explain the behavior of subjects in an apartment search game. The results tend to favor the heuristic model: stopping appears best characterized by a set of individual-specific utility-difference thresholds. Implications of the results for the role of normative versus descriptive models in the development of residential search theory are discussed.

Date: 1985
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a170761 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:17:y:1985:i:6:p:761-776

DOI: 10.1068/a170761

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().