Comparing Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of Residential Mobility and Migration

W A V Clark
Additional contact information
W A V Clark: Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA

Environment and Planning A, 1992, vol. 24, issue 9, 1291-1302

Abstract: A reevaluation of cross-sectional versus longitudinal models of residential mobility confirms the general results of earlier cross-sectional analysis and casts doubt on the study by Davies and Pickles in 1985 in which it was argued that cross-sectional analysis is inadequate and that cross-sectional analysis in behavioral geography “must be viewed with suspicion†. However, it is true that the results from models of time-series data reveal additional complexities not obvious in cross-sectional analysis of mobility and migration.

Date: 1992
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a241291 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:24:y:1992:i:9:p:1291-1302

DOI: 10.1068/a241291

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().