Radical and Postmodern? Power, Social Relations, and Regimes of Truth in the Social Construction of Alternative Economic Geographies

Roger Lee
Additional contact information
Roger Lee: Department of Geography, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, London E1 4NS, England

Environment and Planning A, 2000, vol. 32, issue 6, 991-1009

Abstract: This paper is a response to the question “can radical geography also be postmodern?†It is argued that the answer to this question is “yes†and that this is so because of the contingent, socially constructed nature of the social relations through which the universal but geographically differentiated practices of social reproduction take place. The possibility of radical impulses within postmodern thought is explored through an examination of certain Foucauldian notions of discourse, truth, and power, and Marxian notions of social relations as expressed in the work of Maurice Godelier. A critique of the limited geographical imagination of Foucauldian and Marxist accounts of power provides the context for an argument which suggests that difference is predicated on sameness and that geographies of social reproduction offer one such sameness which is, nevertheless, differentiated by social relations of reproduction. Economic geographies are therefore constructed out of difference and struggle and offer an alternative reading of the economic than that of either Foucault or Marx/Engels. Such socially constructed geographies present the possibilities of resistance to metapractices of power exerted through the discourses of truth and the social relations which are sustained by such discourses. They may be local—although they are not necessarily only local. But they are radical in proposing alternative forms of social relations/discourses. They suggest-again after Foucault—that resistance or struggle is itself a radical impulse. It may or may not stem directly from contradictions in prevailing circuits of social reproduction (that is, it may or may not stem from economic geographies) and it may or may not contribute to the displacement of such metapractices but it does express resistance and practise alternatives. Such resistance is, therefore, politically significant whatever its specific material consequences.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3248 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:6:p:991-1009

DOI: 10.1068/a3248

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().