Floating Choices: A Generational Perspective on Intentions of Rural–Urban Migrants in China

Zhongshan Yue, Shuzhuo Li, Marcus W Feldman and Haifeng Du
Additional contact information
Zhongshan Yue: School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China, and Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Shuzhuo Li: Institute for Population and Develoment Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China
Marcus W Feldman: Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Haifeng Du: Center for Public Administration and Complexity Science, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China

Environment and Planning A, 2010, vol. 42, issue 3, 545-562

Abstract: Using data from a 2005 survey of rural–urban migrants in Shenzhen, we investigate the intentions of two groups of migrants. We use the birth years from 1970 to 1980 as a reasonable range of dividing lines to separate the two groups. For each year we divide the sample into those born before that year and those born in or after that year. These are referred to as the old generation and the new generation, respectively. Three possible development trajectories are considered: settling in cities, returning home to seek a nonagricultural job, and returning home to farm. We find that members of the new generation have stronger desires to do nonfarm work, and that returning to seek a nonagricultural job has become the most important planned trajectory for this generation. Sharp differences exist between the two generations in the reasons that underlie their intentions. For the old generation, conditions such as age, family responsibility, and type of job are important determinants of intentions, while other conditions such as initial migration motives, social capital, and socioeconomic conditions of origin areas are important for the intentions of the new generation. Thus the new generation is more likely to view migration as a form of investment with the accumulation of human capital and social capital. Those migrants from the old generation who have higher education levels also intend to seek a nonfarm job. However, because of the combined effects of life cycle and the market transition in China, these intentions are not as strong as those of the new generation. We discuss economic and policy implications of our findings.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42161 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:3:p:545-562

DOI: 10.1068/a42161

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().