Territorial Cohesion, Territorialism, Territoriality, and Soft Planning: A Critical Review
Andreas Faludi
Additional contact information
Andreas Faludi: Delft University of Technology, OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Oostplantsoen 114, 2611WL Delft, The Netherlands
Environment and Planning A, 2013, vol. 45, issue 6, 1302-1317
Abstract:
Territorial cohesion is a shared EU competence, but what is territory? This paper seeks to alert planners—in particular those involved in European spatial planning—that common-sense answers do not necessarily apply: it is not a container. A view of macrospace as filled with territories-as-containers—territorialism—is nonetheless the basis for common misunderstandings about the EU, and also about European planning, now being articulated in terms of territorial cohesion. Leaving the container view behind means that control over territories—territoriality—must be negotiated, something that relational regionalism also suggests. The planning literature is beginning to absorb such views, articulating soft rather than hard forms of planning for ‘soft spaces’. Hard planning is bound to continue, but it will be embedded in new practices, including the conceptualisation of multiple visions on territory.
Keywords: territorial cohesion; territory; territorialism; territoriality; soft planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a45299 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:6:p:1302-1317
DOI: 10.1068/a45299
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().