Beyond Carbon, More Than Forest? REDD+ Governmentality in Indonesia

Andrew McGregor, Edward Challies, Peter Howson, Rini Astuti, Rowan Dixon, Bethany Haalboom, Michael Gavin, Luca Tacconi and Suraya Afiff
Additional contact information
Andrew McGregor: Department of Geography and Planning, Macquarie University, Herring Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia, and School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
Edward Challies: Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Communication, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Scharnhorstrasse 1, D-21335 Lüneburg, Germany
Michael Gavin: Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, 400 University Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Suraya Afiff: Department of Anthropology, Universitas Indonesia, UI Campus, Depok 16424, Indonesia

Environment and Planning A, 2015, vol. 47, issue 1, 138-155

Abstract: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) is an expanding global initiative oriented at slowing or reversing carbon emissions from forests in the Global South. The programme is based on the principle of payment for environmental services, where the carbon sequestration services of forests are seen to have a financial value which can be paid for through grant and market mechanisms. In this paper we explore how REDD+ is implemented, drawing upon the concept of governmentality. We focus on REDD+ practices in Indonesia, concluding with a case study focused on the Sungai Lamandau REDD+ project in Central Kalimantan. A cross-scalar approach is adopted that explores the different but overlapping strategies of actors congregating at international, national, and local scales. We detail the neoliberal strategies employed by international actors; the more disciplinary approaches evident within national planning processes; and local forms of engagement being practised by a forest community. Our findings reveal REDD+ to be comprised of a heterogeneous regime of disjointed practices that reflect the existing political ecologies and interests of differently located actors. Rather than consolidate these approaches we argue that the strength of the programme lies in its fluidity, which is creating new cross-scalar opportunities, and risks, for those pursuing forms of social and environmental justice.

Keywords: governmentality; environmentality; REDD+; forest governance; environmental justice; Indonesia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a140054p (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:47:y:2015:i:1:p:138-155

DOI: 10.1068/a140054p

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().