Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience

P R Berke, J Crawford, J Dixon and N Ericksen
Additional contact information
P R Berke: Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3140, USA
J Crawford: Planning Consultants Ltd, PO Box 99834, Newmarket, Auckland 1035, New Zealand
J Dixon: Department of Resource and Environmental Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
N Ericksen: The International Global Change Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

Environment and Planning B, 1999, vol. 26, issue 5, 643-664

Abstract: Cooperative mandates represent new thinking about intergovernmental relationships and a shift from the top-down coercive approach. This research presents evidence on how a cooperative national environmental management mandate influences the quality of regional and district plans in New Zealand. Findings indicate that cooperative planning mandates such as New Zealand's Resource Management Act are difficult to translate into practice. The quality of regional and district plans was unimpressive. Empirical modelling shows that clear legislative provisions, the information dissemination strategies of central government, and subnational organisational capacity had an important impact on regional and district plan quality. Alternatively, the organisational capacity and plans of regional councils have little influence on the capacity and plans of district councils. These findings suggest that, though clear mandates are effective, more attention needs to be given to building subnational organisational capacity and to improving the information provision efforts of central government. More attention also needs to be directed to facilitating collaboration between regional and district councils.

Date: 1999
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b260643 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:26:y:1999:i:5:p:643-664

DOI: 10.1068/b260643

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().