Accessibility is Gold, Mobility is Not: A Proposal for the Improvement of Dutch Transport-Related Cost-Benefit Analysis
António Ferreira,
Els Beukers and
Marco Te Brömmelstroet
Additional contact information
António Ferreira: Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 36-40 University Road, LS2 0JT, Leeds, England
Environment and Planning B, 2012, vol. 39, issue 4, 683-697
Abstract:
Cost—benefit analysis (CBA) has become a key instrument for the evaluation of transport planning policies and projects in the Netherlands. Currently, this instrument is also used to evaluate integrated land-use and transport strategies. In Dutch transport-related CBA the conceptualisation of benefits is directly related to a narrow understanding of mobility. In this paper we argue that this understanding introduces an undesirable bias in transport planning that favours mobility-enhancing projects. We argue that the benefit to society of contemporary transport planning practice is no longer the improvement of mobility, but the improvement of accessibility. Therefore, Dutch CBA should acknowledge this in its calculations and shift from a mobility focus towards an accessibility orientation. We use a hypothetical illustration to show what the added value of an accessibility orientation can be. It facilitates a mindset where new and more sustainable directions for improving the competitiveness of regions are easier to find.
Keywords: cost—benefit analysis; transport planning; accessibility; mobility; assessment tools (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b38073 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:683-697
DOI: 10.1068/b38073
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().