Measuring polycentric structures of megaregions in China: Linking morphological and functional dimensions

Wei Chen, Oleg Golubchikov and Zhigao Liu
Additional contact information
Wei Chen: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Oleg Golubchikov: 2112Cardiff University, UK; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
Zhigao Liu: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Environment and Planning B, 2021, vol. 48, issue 8, 2272-2288

Abstract: The idea of megaregions, which focuses on polycentricity, competitiveness, and integration attracts much attention in research and policy. China has used megaregions as a normative governance framework that leverages polycentric regional development for balancing economic competitiveness and spatial development. This paper explores to what extent these megaregions actually reveal polycentric versus monocentric structures. The analysis demonstrates a divergence between the morphological and functional organization of China’s megaregions. Five types of megaregions are identified as per the relationships between the morphological and functional dimensions. Functionally, the Pearl River Delta, Shandong Peninsula, and Yangtze River Delta are among the most polycentric megaregions. The majority of others, even where morphologically polycentric, do not exhibit high degrees of functional polycentricity. The study demonstrates a problematic nature of megaregions as a governance agenda for regional polycentricity. It argues that if China genuinely wants to achieve greater levels of polycentricity and spatial cohesion, differentiated policies should be implemented for megaregions.

Keywords: Megaregion; polycentricity; spatial structure; city network; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320974687 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:8:p:2272-2288

DOI: 10.1177/2399808320974687

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().