EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Enhancing digital twin technology with community-led, science-driven participatory modeling: A case in green infrastructure planning

Moira L Zellner, Dean Massey, Michelle Laboy, Daniel T O’Brien, Amy Mueller and Daniel Engelberg

Environment and Planning B, 2026, vol. 53, issue 4, 872-896

Abstract: Recent research, professional, and funding agendas have re-surfaced the importance of knowledge co-production and ethical participation to address urban tensions worldwide: urbanization and rapid climate change, disproportionately impacting socially vulnerable populations. Despite the rise of Digital Twins (DT), buoyed by the growth of computational and data technologies in the past 10 to 15 years, DT have fallen short of their promise to address these tensions. We present a participatory modeling (PM) platform, Fora.ai, to build on existing strengths of DT and overcome the most prevalent limitations of data-driven technologies. This platform (i.e., a set of visualization and simulation tools and facilitation and sense-making approaches) is organized around the iterative steps in PM: problem definition and goal setting, preference elicitation, collaborative scenario-building, simulation, tradeoff deliberation, and solution-building. We demonstrate the platform’s effectiveness when set within a stakeholder-led process that integrates diverse knowledge, data sources, and values in pursuit of equitable green infrastructure (GI) planning to address flooding. The immediate visualization of simulated impacts, followed by reflection on causal and spatial relationships and tradeoffs across diverse priorities, enhanced participants’ collective understanding of how GI interacts with the built environment and physical conditions to inform their intervention scenarios. The facilitated use of Fora.ai enabled a collaborative socio-technical sense-making process, whereby participants transitioned from untested beliefs to designs that were specifically tailored to the problem in the study area and the diversity of values represented, attending to both localized flooding and neighborhood-level impacts. They also derived generalizable design principles that could be applied elsewhere. We show how the combination of specific facilitation practices and platform features leverage the power of data, computational modeling, and social complexity to contribute to collaborative learning and creative and equitable solution-building for urban sustainability and climate resilience.

Keywords: Collaborative modeling platforms; microspatial inequities; democratizing decision-making; environmental justice; negotiating tradeoffs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251323671 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:872-896

DOI: 10.1177/23998083251323671

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-04
Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:4:p:872-896