The Marketing of Meaning: Aesthetics Incorporated

P Harries, A Lipman and S Purden

Environment and Planning B, 1982, vol. 9, issue 4, 457-466

Abstract: The discussion in this paper focuses on the ways in which notions of meaning are customarily handled in architectural theory, especially notions of aesthetic meaning. The topic is considered in two contexts: that of ‘postmodern’ architecture during the late 1960s and the 1970s and that of ‘modern’ architecture in the two decades following World War 1. In the main, postmodern theorists have, we argue, sought to market prescriptive concepts concerning meaning; they have treated aesthetic meanings as commodities, as objects to be packaged for consumption. Though many advocates of the modern movement also dealt prescriptively with meaning, they anticipated an end to treating aesthetic meanings as marketable objects, as commodities. Whereas leading modernists challenged the dominant cultural ideas of their time, postmodern theorists embrace, incorporate such dominance. In exploring this viewpoint, we illustrate our contention that meanings are produced socially, that people endow buildings with meaning and that they do so in the context of specific social relationships.

Date: 1982
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b090457 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:9:y:1982:i:4:p:457-466

DOI: 10.1068/b090457

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().