Influences on Small-Firm Compliance-Related Behaviour: The Case of Workplace Health and Safety

Robert Baldock, Philip James, David Smallbone and Ian Vickers
Additional contact information
Robert Baldock: Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, England
Philip James: Department of Human Resource Management and Organisational Behaviour, Business School, Oxford Brookes University, Wheatley, Oxford OX33 1HX, England
David Smallbone: Small Business Research Centre, Kingston Business School, Kingston University, Kingston Hill, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 7LB, England
Ian Vickers: Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, England

Environment and Planning C, 2006, vol. 24, issue 6, 827-846

Abstract: The authors investigate the relative roles of a number of influences on workplace health and safety in small firms and, more specifically, the adoption of compliance-related improvement measures. From findings drawn from a survey of over a thousand British small enterprises, marked variations in firm behaviour with respect to health and safety were found, underlining the heterogeneity of small firms in this respect, and the way such behaviour reflects their varied contexts. Factors identified as being particularly associated with a propensity to make compliance-related improvements were: regulatory enforcement activity, use of external assistance with respect to health and safety issues, enterprise size and growth performance, management training and experience, and membership of trade or business associations. Although, as a group, ethnic-minority businesses were found to be neither more or less likely to make improvements of this type compared with their white-owned counterparts, detailed analysis revealed that such variations did exist between individual ethnic groupings; variations that are themselves seen to reflect a number of factors, particularly the employment size and sectoral context. Primarily the authors conclude that inspections on the part of regulatory officials are the most important influence, although there is some scope for more innovative approaches to encouraging compliance-related improvements.

Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c0564 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:24:y:2006:i:6:p:827-846

DOI: 10.1068/c0564

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().