Plugging the Accountability Gap? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regional Scrutiny
Rachel Ashworth,
Stephanie Snape and
Sundeep Aulakh
Additional contact information
Rachel Ashworth: Centre for Local and Regional Government Research, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, Wales
Stephanie Snape: Local Government Centre, Warwick Business School, Coventry University, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
Sundeep Aulakh: EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd, St. James House, Vicar Lane, Sheffield S1 2EX, England
Environment and Planning C, 2007, vol. 25, issue 2, 194-211
Abstract:
The UK government contends that regional assemblies can assist in reducing the democratic deficit in the English regions. This paper presents a preliminary assessment of the new scrutiny role performed by the assemblies. Our conceptual framework identifies five variables which might influence the effectiveness of regional scrutiny. Regional scrutiny is found to be quite distinct from that conducted by parliament, local government, and other devolved institutions. Analysis of qualitative data suggests that regional scrutiny has been limited by a lack of clearly defined powers, inadequate technical support, and an often ‘cosy’ relationship between assemblies and their Regional Development Agencies. We conclude that regional assemblies urgently require appropriate legitimacy, powers, and resources in order to prevent the accountability gap from widening.
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c55m (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:194-211
DOI: 10.1068/c55m
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().