Vulnerability and Capacity: Explaining Local Commitment to Climate-Change Policy

Sammy Zahran, Samuel D Brody, Arnold Vedlitz, Himanshu Grover and Caitlyn Miller
Additional contact information
Samuel D Brody: Environmental Planning and Sustainability Research Unit, Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3137, USA
Arnold Vedlitz: Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, 4350 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4350, USA
Himanshu Grover: Environmental Planning and Sustainability Research Unit, Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3137, USA
Caitlyn Miller: Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, 4350 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4350, USA

Environment and Planning C, 2008, vol. 26, issue 3, 544-562

Abstract: We examine the reasons why a US locality would voluntarily commit to the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) campaign. Using geographic information systems analytic techniques, we map and measure a locality's vulnerability to climate-change impacts at the county level of spatial precision. We analyze multiple measures of climate-change vulnerability, including expected temperature change, extreme weather events, and coastal proximity, as well as economic variables, demographic variables, and civic-participation variables that constitute a locality's socioeconomic capacity to commit to costly climate-change policy initiatives. Bivariate and logistic regression results indicate that CCP-committed localities are quantitatively different to noncommitted localities on both climate-change risk and socioeconomic-capacity dimensions. On vulnerability measures, the odds of CCP-campaign participation increase significantly with the number of people killed and injured by extreme weather events, projected temperature change, and coastal proximity. On socioeconomic-capacity measures, the odds of CCP-campaign involvement increase with the percentage of citizens that vote Democrat and recycle, as well as the number of nonprofit organizations with an environment focus. The odds decrease in a county area as the percentage of the labor force employed in carbon-intensive industries increases.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c2g (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:26:y:2008:i:3:p:544-562

DOI: 10.1068/c2g

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().