What is Wrong with Virtual Water Trading? On the Limitations of the Virtual Water Concept

Erik Gawel and Kristina Bernsen
Additional contact information
Erik Gawel: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
Kristina Bernsen: Universitat Leipzig, Institut für Infrastruktur und Ressourcenmanagement Grimmaische, Straße 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany

Environment and Planning C, 2013, vol. 31, issue 1, 168-181

Abstract: Virtual water, the amount of water used along a good's value chain, has come under discussion. Fairness and efficiency problems are seen to arise in the reallocation of access to water resources through the means of international trade. Moral issues are attached to both imports and exports, and even to a country's own consumption of virtual water. Global institutional arrangements have therefore been suggested to regulate virtual water trade both efficiently and ‘fairly’. With this paper we will provide a short overview of the concept's history and findings, and an analysis from the perspective of economic trade theory, bringing up the old debate about the economic and environmental merits of free trade. The contribution of this paper will be to examine the performance of virtual water concepts in advising business or policy decisions in the form of global governance arrangements. It must be concluded that the virtual water concept is limited in terms of its usefulness in providing policy advice. The usually applied normative criteria are inconsistent, implying governance schemes that improve neither efficiency nor sustainability Water-related problems should be solved in the respective arenas and not by global governance schemes or trade barriers.

Keywords: virtual water; water footprint; international trade; global water governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c11168 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:31:y:2013:i:1:p:168-181

DOI: 10.1068/c11168

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().