Seeing like a border city: Refugee politics at the borders of city and nation-state

Julie EE Young

Environment and Planning C, 2019, vol. 37, issue 3, 407-423

Abstract: Local advocacy practices in Detroit–Windsor in response to the refugee “crisis†that unfolded around the Canada–US border in early 1987 revealed a different way of working with the border in the city. They were “seeing like a border city†: working as though Detroit–Windsor were one place, even as they made use of the ways in which it remained two distinct places with different political and legal contexts. Advocates mobilized resources and expertise on both sides of the border, drawing on the sense of community offered by the city, and made use of the distinct policy frameworks, securing legal status for refugees who had been consigned to legal limbo through the policies of both states. This approach troubled the state’s logic of border control even as it refortified the boundaries of exclusion underlying it. Their work highlights the possibilities and limitations of advocacy work around an international boundary line.

Keywords: Border cities; Canada–US border; Detroit–Windsor; refugee policy; advocacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654418790765 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:37:y:2019:i:3:p:407-423

DOI: 10.1177/2399654418790765

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().