Centralisation and Decentralisation: A Framework for Comparative Analysis

E Page and M J Goldsmith
Additional contact information
E Page: Department of Politics, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England
M J Goldsmith: Department of Politics and Contemporary History, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lanes, England

Environment and Planning C, 1985, vol. 3, issue 2, 175-185

Abstract: One of the reasons for the paucity of comparative studies of central — local government relations is the absence of a common set of terms and concepts which may form the basis for comparison. Commonly used terms, such as ‘centralisation’ and ‘decentralisation’, are highly ambiguous. In order that comparative study may develop, it is important to isolate the salient dimensions along which patterns of central-local relations vary cross-nationally. On the basis of an exploration of central — local relations in European unitary states, there are three main dimensions for comparison: The functions of local government, the discretion that local authorities have in carrying them out, and the patterns of access between the political and the administrative elites of the centre and locality.

Date: 1985
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c030175 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:3:y:1985:i:2:p:175-185

DOI: 10.1068/c030175

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().