‘A bureaucracy within a bureaucracy’: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans and relationships under the Maa-nulth Treaty

Onyx Sloan Morgan and Heather Castleden

Environment and Planning C, 2025, vol. 43, issue 7, 1426-1446

Abstract: Despite the acknowledgement of the importance of relations with the ocean for nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ ways of being, relationships between Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ Nations remain rife with power inequities. The existence, form, and right for nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ to practice fishing, including commercial fishing, is one such flashpoint where relationships with DFO and thus Canada’s policy and general orientation to First Nations are strained. Even for huuÊ•iiÊ”atḥ, one of the five First Nations signatories to the Maa-nulth Treaty, coming to the table as equal treaty partners has been difficult due to DFO’s orientation to nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ fishing rights, the hierarchy of scientific knowledges, and lack of recognitions of legal authorities through hawiÅ‚patak hawiih. Based on our 10 years of research into the implementation of the Maa-nulth Treaty, in this paper we explore the relationship between Huu-ay-aht First Nations and DFO. To do so, we begin by overviewing the process of reserve creation across nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ ḥaḥuuÅ‚i and how colonial understandings and creations of ‘fisheries’ played a key role in dispossession. We then turn to our interviews with Maa-nulth First Nations negotiation and implementation teams to explore how reconciliation and fishing rights have emerged through the Maa-nulth Treaty, and how nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚ knowledges have been disregarded by the DFO. We conclude by profiling the tensions, strengths, and challenges huuÊ•iiÊ”atḥ have experienced in exercising their treaty rights, inclusive of hawiÅ‚patak hawiih, through the Maa-nulth Treaty and specifically with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Keywords: Maa-nulth Treaty; Huu-ay-aht First Nations; fisheries; modern treaties; nuuÄ aanÌ“uÅ‚; Department of Fisheries and Oceans; Canada; British Columbia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544251334524 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:43:y:2025:i:7:p:1426-1446

DOI: 10.1177/23996544251334524

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().