EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Agricultural Land-Use Policies and Rural Spatial Differentiation in Colonial and Postcolonial Zimbabwe

C O Rambanapasi
Additional contact information
C O Rambanapasi: Department of Rural and Urban Planning, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

Environment and Planning C, 1991, vol. 9, issue 2, 225-236

Abstract: Agricultural development policies in colonial Zimbabwe were a specific outcome of the manner in which the country was colonised by British settlers from South Africa in 1890. The gold rush was the main motivation for colonisation of Zimbabwe and with its failure, agricultural land increased in value, which sparked off an unprecedented land scramble among the settlers which initiated the process of rural spatial differentiation. Successive colonial governments pursued dual agricultural policies aimed at developing European commercial agriculture while simultaneously underdeveloping African subsistence agriculture through systematic disinvestment. The attempt by the postcolonial African government to reverse this dual agricultural policy failed because of a combination of factors including the Lancaster House constitutional guarantees for rights to private property and the African politicians' failure by default or design to achieve a substantive ideological turnabout.

Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c090225 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirc:v:9:y:1991:i:2:p:225-236

DOI: 10.1068/c090225

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning C
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:9:y:1991:i:2:p:225-236