 The Social Specificity of Societal Nature Relations in a Flexible Capitalist SocietyDennis Eversberg Environmental Values, 2021, vol. 30, issue 3, 319-343 Abstract: Based on analyses of a 2016 German survey, this article contributes to debates on ‘societal nature relations’ by investigating the systematic differences between socially specific types of social relations with nature in a flexible capitalist society. It presents a typology of ten different ‘syndromes’ of attitudes toward social and environmental issues, which are then grouped to distinguish between four ideal types of social relationships with nature: dominance, conscious mutual dependency, alienation and contradiction . These are located in Pierre Bourdieu's (1984) social space to illustrate how social relationships with nature correspond to people's positions within the totality of social relations. Understanding how people's perceptions of and actions pertaining to nature are shaped by their positions in these intersecting relations of domination – both within social space and between society and nature – is an important precondition for developing transformative strategies that will be capable of gaining majority support in flexible capitalist societies. Keywords: Capitalism; environmental behaviour; environmental consciousness; social class; social domination; societal nature relations; social relations with nature (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envval:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:319-343 DOI: 10.3197/096327120X15916910310581 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Environmental Values |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.