Why Economic Valuation Does Not Value the Environment: Climate Policy as Collective Endeavour

Nicholas Bardsley, Graziano Ceddia, Rachel McCloy and Simone Pfuderer

Environmental Values, 2022, vol. 31, issue 3, 277-293

Abstract: Economics takes an individualistic approach to human behaviour. This is reflected in the use of ‘contingent valuation’ surveys to conduct cost benefit analysis for economic policy evaluation. An individual's valuation of a policy is assumed to be unaffected by the burdens it places on others. We report a survey experiment to test this supposition in the context of climate change policy. Willingness to pay for climate change mitigation was higher when richer individuals were to bear higher costs than when, as is usual, no explicit information was provided about cost distribution. This result is inconsistent with the usual interpretation of contingent valuation data. It also suggests that the data may be biased indicators of policy acceptance. Additional survey questions suggest that a collective mode of reasoning is common.

Keywords: Contingent valuation; climate change mitigation; public opinion; methodological individualism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327121X16081160834740 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envval:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:277-293

DOI: 10.3197/096327121X16081160834740

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environmental Values
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().