Debate on De-industrialization Revisited: The Process of Decline of Traditional Flexible Manufacturing

Vijay K. Seth
Additional contact information
Vijay K. Seth: Vijay K. Seth is a Professor in Strategy & General Management, International Management Institute, New Delhi 110016. E-mail: vkseth1950@yahoo.co.in

Global Business Review, 2014, vol. 15, issue 3, 597-610

Abstract: In the present article, an attempt has been made to revisit the debate on de-industrialization. The premise, which has been used by the author, is based on an historical fact regarding the organizational structure of production and distribution of handicrafts. The organization of production, which had provided competitive advantage to the Indian manufacturing to become one of the largest suppliers of manufactured goods, had emerged as a consequence of nexus between merchants and craftsmen. The organizational structure that emerged due to their nexus has been defined here as ‘Traditional Flexible Manufacturing’. It has been argued in this article that as long as the nexus between merchants and craftsmen continued to exist, Indian manufacturing had capability to produce abundant quantity of quality handicrafts to satisfy the demands of mass markets. The moment their nexus was broken Indian manufacturing experienced de-industrialization. The nexus, which enjoyed its peak during the Mughal Empire, was broken by the political ascendency of the East Indian Company.

Keywords: Proto-Industrialization; Traditional Flexible Manufacturing; Putting–Out System de-industrialization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150914537932 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:3:p:597-610

DOI: 10.1177/0972150914537932

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Business Review from International Management Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().