EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Examining Efficiencies of Indian ADRs and their Underlying Stocks

Aditi Singh and Madhumita Chakraborty

Global Business Review, 2017, vol. 18, issue 1, 144-162

Abstract: In this article, the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is tested for US and Indian stock markets and Indian American depositary receipts (ADRs) and their underlying stocks. The approach used to observe changing market efficiency is time-varying Hurst exponent. The Hurst values have been calculated after filtering the financial asset return series for short-term dependence and volatility. Rolling window approach has been used to calculate Hurst exponent and observe time-varying long-range dependence. The data are filtered by autoregressive-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (AR-GARCH) method. The empirical results suggest that US stock market is more efficient than Indian stock market. All the ADRs, their underlying stocks and markets of both the countries have shown varying efficiency. The change in efficiency of Indian ADRs is more when compared to their underlying stocks, which suggests that stock of a company listed on stock indices of different countries may show different pace of evolution of efficiency depending on maturity of the market.

Keywords: Long-range dependence; Indian ADRs; Hurst exponent; AR-GARCH; efficient market hypothesis; emerging market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150916666948 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:globus:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:144-162

DOI: 10.1177/0972150916666948

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Business Review from International Management Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:144-162