The Polarization and Differentiation of Employment Relations and New Organizational Models
Manfred Fuchs
Additional contact information
Manfred Fuchs: Department of International Management, Karl Franzens University
Global Business Review, 2001, vol. 2, issue 2, 243-257
Abstract:
The main effort set out in this article is to problematize that the newer organizational models, largely by introducing flexible employment relations and by radically dissolving the traditional boundaries of the firm, are losing their flexibilized workforce as a firm-specific source of success. Special attention is devoted to the linkage between the rise of flexible employment relations and the diminishing capability of newer organiza tional models to sustain firm-specific sources of competitive advantage. We argue that this decreasing capa bility is a consequence of the growing inability to retain a skilled and knowledgeable workforce. In the first part of the article we describe how the traditional organizational order is challenged. We then summarize the main structural deficiencies of the Fordist organization and argue that the newer organizational models do not offer a coherent solution to these problems. We continue to discuss the linkage between the consequences of the growing dissolution of standard employment and the decreasing capability of the newer organizational models to retain and reproduce the sources of their sustainability. We emphasize that the workforce increas ingly is a non-replicable and firm-specific source of sustainable advantage that cannot be easily imitated by competitors if retained within organizational boundaries.
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097215090100200207 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:globus:v:2:y:2001:i:2:p:243-257
DOI: 10.1177/097215090100200207
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Global Business Review from International Management Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().