EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

China–Africa Relations: An Analysis of Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) Documents Using Shinn and Eisenman’s Optimist–Pessimist Dual Framework

Sithara Fernando
Additional contact information
Sithara Fernando: Sithara Fernando, Senior Lecturer, Department of Strategic Studies, Faculty of Defence and Strategic Studies, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka. E-mail: sitharaf@gmail.com

Insight on Africa, 2014, vol. 6, issue 2, 145-160

Abstract: Using Shinn and Eisenman’s Optimist–Pessimist dual framework this article has analysed contemporary China–Africa relations through documents produced by the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation. This analysis both substantiates and problematises the Optimist and Pessimist perspectives that make up the framework. It identifies zero-sum thinking as a weakness common to key postulates of both the perspectives. In the Optimist perspective, China provides Africa with a political counterweight to the West. In the Pessimist perspective, the strengthening of China–Africa relations constitutes an unwelcome challenge to the West in Africa. In both cases, the gain of one party results in a loss for the other. In the first case, Africa’s gain results in a loss to the West and, in the second case, it is China’s gain as against a loss to the West. In order to rectify this weakness, it calls for greater non-zero-sum thinking in the West in response to the growing China–Africa relationship aimed at realising joint gains for all parties.

Keywords: China; Africa; Optimist perspective; Pessimist perspective (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0975087814535462 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:inafri:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:145-160

DOI: 10.1177/0975087814535462

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Insight on Africa
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:145-160