Is there overestimation of 'British capital' outflow? Keynes' Indo-British trade and transfer accounts re-examined with alternative evidence

Debdas Banerjee
Additional contact information
Debdas Banerjee: Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata

The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 2004, vol. 41, issue 2, 143-164

Abstract: An excessive export of capitalfrom Britain during 1870-1914 allegedly reduced the domestic rate of investment. Few studies have really tried to find out how much of the nominal sum in each case was taken up by British investors, and how much of that, in turn, actually found its way abroad. The profits that accrued from trade in colonial products are either ignored altogether or grossly underestimated in the usual accounts of 'benefits of imperialism'. Drawing on Indo-British official trade statistics as well as on private papers, this article re- examines Keynes'estimate of 'drain' from England into India based on the sales of Council Bills. The conclusions of this study are: (a) the profits on Indo-British commodity value chains were much higher than they were assumed to be; and (b) a very large part of the 'British'capital outflom to colonies was in fact recycled profits made on colonial trade.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001946460404100202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indeco:v:41:y:2004:i:2:p:143-164

DOI: 10.1177/001946460404100202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Indian Economic & Social History Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().