 ÅšÄ ntarasa in the RÄ jataraá¹…giṇī: History, epic, and moral decayLawrence McCrea
The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 2013, vol. 50, issue 2, 179-199 Abstract: This article considers the implications of Kalhaṇa’s statement that in his great poetic history â€˜Å›Ä ntarasa rules supreme’. Kalhaṇa’s identification of the emotional mood he seeks to cultivate has often been noted, but its implications for Kalhaṇa’s historical vision have seldom been discussed in depth. In framing the aesthetic content of his work in terms of Å›Ä ntarasa, the aestheticised emotion of ‘quiescence’, Kalhaṇa links it with the only Å›Ä ntarasa poem acknowledged by the poeticians of Kashmir at the time—the MahÄ bhÄ rata . The MahÄ bhÄ rata is the great canonical example of such a poem, first discussed as such by Ä€nandavardhana in his DhvanyÄ loka . On Ä€nandavardhana’s reading, the MahÄ bhÄ rata is to be seen as a Å›Ä ntarasa text because, through the lamentable ends to which even the ‘victors’ in its cataclysmic war are reduced, it inculcates despair with all worldly endeavour, inducing readers to turn instead to the path of renunciation. By explicitly invoking Å›Ä ntarasa, Kalhaṇa places both the MahÄ bhÄ rata and Kashmiri aestheticians’ discourse on it in the background of his own narrative, particularly his treatment of moral decay—the way even ‘good’ kings regularly go bad and the most promising political endeavours lead only to decay, loss and despair. Keywords: Kalhaṇa; Kashmir; history; epic; rasa (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indeco:v:50:y:2013:i:2:p:179-199 Access Statistics for this article More articles in The Indian Economic & Social History Review |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.