Slaves and slavery in the Smá¹›ticandrikÄ

Donald R. Davis
Additional contact information
Donald R. Davis: Department of Asian Studies, University of Texas, Austin, TX

The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 2020, vol. 57, issue 3, 299-326

Abstract: This article contains both a study and a translation of the laws relating to slavery found in the thirteenth-century Hindu law digest called the Smá¹›ticandrikÄ . By focusing on a single text, we can clearly see the ideology of slavery in the view of one important author of medieval India. First, slaves formed one end of a categorical continuum of workers, all of whom laboured for the benefit of others as they were denied legal autonomy. While not equivalent, slavery and other forms of work formed a unified topic under what is often called Master and Servant law. Second, slaves were frequently likened to both Śūdras and wives in the text, indicating the persistent relevance of caste and gender to slave status. As a result, the characterisation of slavery as ‘social death’ is less helpful in this case than the unsettling idea that slavery is an intensified form of work in general. All work, including slavery, is affected by a loss of freedom and personal benefit, as well as the biases of social stratification.

Keywords: slavery; workers; labour; Hindu law; DharmaÅ›Ä stra; Smá¹›ticandrikÄ; servant (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019464620930893 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indeco:v:57:y:2020:i:3:p:299-326

DOI: 10.1177/0019464620930893

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Indian Economic & Social History Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().