The Burden of Intelligibility: Disabled Women’s Testimony in Rape Trials

Saptarshi Mandal

Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2013, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-29

Abstract: What is the evidentiary value accorded to a woman’s testimony in a rape trial, when she is disabled? How is her testimony—conveyed non-verbally and made accessible to the judges through an interpreter—processed by a legal culture that values descriptive precision and intelligibility? How does ‘intelligibility’ itself act as a sieve through which the testimony of the disabled prosecutrix is passed to determine if the allegation of rape is proved beyond reasonable doubt? By examining judicial decisions of Indian courts in cases of rape of disabled women, this article attempts to explore these questions and shows how the testimony of the disabled prosecutrix is devalued and disregarded through a combination of evidentiary, doctrinal and ideological practices inscribed in law.

Keywords: Disabled women; testimony; rape trial; intelligibility; legal process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521512465934 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:indgen:v:20:y:2013:i:1:p:1-29

DOI: 10.1177/0971521512465934

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Indian Journal of Gender Studies from Centre for Women's Development Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().