Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations

Kanti Bajpai
Additional contact information
Kanti Bajpai: The author is Professor in the Politics and International Relations of South Asia, Oxford University, Oxford, UK. E-mail: kanti.bajpai@area.ox.ac.uk.

International Studies, 2009, vol. 46, issue 1-2, 109-128

Abstract: This article suggests that, from 1947 to the late 1980s, Indian International Relations (IIR) led the developing world and certainly Asian IR. Since then, China, Korea and Japan seem to have taken the lead. The article defines the nature of ‘good work’ as ‘good published work’ and argues that there are five key obstacles to better published work in IIR: the neglect of theory; the failure to define a series of animating puzzles, problematiques and problem-solving agendas; the lack of methodological training; the quality of teaching; and the mismanagement of professional life. Three reasons are advanced for the origins and persistence of these obstacles: post-colonial parochialism; the influence of the formative moment of the field in India; and the relationship of Political Science/IR to the Indian state. The article concludes that the remedies are primarily in the hands of Indian scholars and not with the government.

Keywords: Indian IR; theory; methodology; puzzles; problematiques; teaching; post-colonialism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002088171004600208 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:intstu:v:46:y:2009:i:1-2:p:109-128

DOI: 10.1177/002088171004600208

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().