Western and Islamic International Theories

Mohammed Nuruzzaman

International Studies, 2018, vol. 55, issue 2, 106-129

Abstract: Islamic theories of international relations (IR) have been traditionally dominated by debates between two distinct approaches—traditionalism and modernism. A third perspective, often labelled the ‘jihadist perspective’, has emerged following the 11 September 2001 attacks and this radical perspective principally embodies the worldview of al-Qaeda and its off-shoot the Islamic State. The jihadist perspective directly challenges the Western concepts, methods and theories of IR. This article examines how the Islamic and Western international theories clash in terms of ontological foundations, epistemological approaches and modes of inquiry. It argues that Islamic discourse on IR has contributed to the development of a set of theories to analyse and interpret relations between the Islamic and the non-Islamic world, and secondly, it implicitly presents arguments in favour of opening up IR for rather more global perspectives.

Keywords: Western international theories; Islamic international theories; secularism versus Islamic faith; Muslim traditionalists; Muslim modernists; ontological and epistemological bases of Western and Islamic international theories (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020881718790687 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:intstu:v:55:y:2018:i:2:p:106-129

DOI: 10.1177/0020881718790687

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().