 The Current State of Macroeconomics: Is It Time for a New Approach?Ronald L. Cooper
Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1999, vol. 10, issue 3, 241-265 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to assess the current state of macroeconomics and determine whether the subject is a useful tool both in public and private planning decisions. First, I discuss briefly the history of and assess the keynesian and neoclassical macroeconomic models and their counterpart, econometrics, by examining the empirical record of forecasting and structural stability of the various models. Second, I examine the alternative methodology of the Austrian school, that uses logical deduction from assumed true axioms rather than the scientific method in deriving economic theory. My general conclusion is that mainstream Keynesian and neoclassical economic theory, combined with econometric analysis, has not provided very much, if any, useful information to either public or private planners. While the Austrian approach seems at the outset to be an attractive alternative to the mainstream economic schools of thought, it is faced with the difficulty of determining how its so-called “self evident†axioms are true. Some Austrians trace their methodology back to Aristotle, who said that self evident propositions are based on empiricism. The problem of establishing which axioms are self evident needs to be solved before Austrian economics is able to gain wide spread acceptance among the economics community. Date: 1999 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jinter:v:10:y:1999:i:3:p:241-265 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.